Court Testimony Often Pales in Comparison to Smackdowns Between Judges and Lawyers

At weeks end in one of the biggest conspiracy trials the United States has ever had, the main players are going their separate ways.  Jurors climb on a bus for a long ride.  The lawyers go back to offices and resume working.  One goes back to prison. When you would like to get more information on accidents at work check out this site.  As he prepared to bring to a close the days proceedings, District Judge rushes to get off his bench and out of the courtroom.  He doesn?t want to endure any more questions from lawyers. A smile, not often seen, crossed the defendant’s face. He appeared drained from replying to seemingly endless queries without expressing much feeling. Marshals escort him to the detention facility where he serves his one to four-year sentence for obstruction of justice.  The judge wished the jurors a comfortable bus ride and advised them to relax and enjoy their weekend. The jurors, who have been sequestered in a motel for the trial, are going to have an excursion this weekend.  They may even get a picnic. The judge did not have similarly pleasant things to say to the attorneys who were still displaying great hostility to one another and to the judge, despite being told to stop.  He has confessed his wrongdoing in covering up the case. In my opinion, this means all of you have done a great job. He has given his testimony, and now the jury must decide if he is to be believed. He calls for a recess and when everyone returns he admonishes the jury to resist falling under the influence of the court. This site teaches you about victorian workcover.  It’s impossible to predict the outcome at this point. The accused was committed to his version of events, which supported the testimony of the cover up. He told the story at televised committee hearings. Both stories corroborated the other. Some of the pertinent dates were a little messed up. The testimony was not nearly as interesting as the battles waged between lawyers and the judge.  Spectators had lined up early to try to get a seat.  Because the government had not released the name of the person who would be the next witness after Monday?s witness, another huge row erupted.  The jury and accused had already been escorted from the courtroom. According to the chief prosecutor, the name of the witness was unknown to him, and regardless, the government was not obligated to provide the information more than one day in advance. In an attempt to avoid yet another nasty argument, he agrees that there’s really no reason why the name of the witness can’t be provided.  A compromise was sought by the district attorney once again. He wanted to go on record as protesting the way the prosecution went about trying the case. I have been waiting months in vain for discovery. They don?t give us the witness names so that we are less effective during cross examination. “We’ve provided a wealth of transcript pages while they contend their testimony would fit on the back of a match cover.” Laughter rocked the courtroom when, sighing, the district attorney stated that he thought they’d been getting along fine up until now. As he rose from his chair and prepared to leave, the judge’s final remark was that he had more than enough problems keeping the lawyers in check.

-
About the Author:
I spent the rest of my years there and graduated from High School in 1982. I played football (wide receiver) and ran track (hurdles). My senior year I qualified for the state track meet in the 110 HH where I finished 3rd to last in my heat. One guy crashed and the other I guess was slow. I was actually leading into the first hurdle, but made an error, (I got airborn) got out of step and could not recover
Article Source

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
        

Leave a Reply